Posts Tagged ‘Federal Court’

Sherard keeps on slum lordin’; feds seek city help

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Will Sherard, one of Milwaukee’s most notorious landlords, continues to thumb his nose at the federal government four years after the feds sued him over the poor condition of his properties.

“Sherard was to have twenty-nine (29) properties abated by the end of March 2009,” Assistant US Attorney Stacy Gerber Ward wrote in a court document late last month. “To date, the United States is aware of Sherard completing abatement work on only two (2) of those properties.”

The federal government now is asking a judge to order  Sherard  to put $550,00 into escrow and to appoint the City of Milwaukee Health Department to administer and oversee the repair work that Sherard has refused to do.

The feds’ showdown with Sherard has been in and out of US District Judge Joseph P. Stadtmueller’s courtoom for years.

A 2005 federal court consent decree required Sherard to complete window replacement and lead-based paint hazard abatement work on 39 residential properties by July 2008 and July 2010, respectively. He was found in contempt of court in July 2008 for failing to repair the properties. Stadtmueller set new deadlines and $500 daily fines for each property not repaired in a timely fashion. In February, the judge ordered Sherard to provide the government with a financial disclosure statement.

“The financial disclosure forms submitted by Mr. Sherard provided almost no information,” Gerber Ward wrote last month. “In regards to his income and other financial information, Mr. Sherard stated ’see tax returns.’ While Mr. Sherard’s tax returns do identify the various institutions in which he holds his assets and his dividend and/or interest income from these assets, the tax returns do not identify current balances or transactions that would be significant to the United States assessment of Mr. Sherard’s financial condition.”

Sherard told an official from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development that “the work is expensive, that he did not anticipate these expenses, and he suggested that he did not have the funds to complete the work,” according to a government court filing. City of Milwaukee records, though, show that Sherard took out a total of about $1.7 million in mortgages on many of the properties he was supposed to fix right before and after signing the consent decree.  The total estimated cost of the work on all the properties is $496,000. Another $30,000 or so is needed to pay for new or updated property assessments, according to court records.

The accumulated contempt penalties Sherard faces is more than $711,000, according to court documents.

Previous coverage of Sherard’s legal adventures is here.

Pimping girls on craigslist

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

A Milwaukee man who pimped out his son’s juvenile girlfriends advertised their sexual services on craigslist and sold them both locally and in other states, federal prosecutors allege.

Craigslist has said it is attempting to reduce the number of erotic odds posted on its site. The popular advertising site was sued in federal court by Cook County, Illinois Sheriff Tom Dart who alleged craigslist is facilitating prostitution.

In the Milwaukee case, Todd Carter, 39, and Nicholas Harrison, Carter’s 19-year-old son, are facing charges of conspiracy to sex traffic in children and other related crimes.

The men allegedly were serious about their work: Carter even told a girl she should quit her job at Burger King to devote more time to prostitution, according to the indictment.

Prosecutors allege the two men ran their prostitution business out of their apartment in the 2300 block of N. 1st St. Harrison would entice girls into being his girlfriends, then Carter would set them up as prostitutes. Carter had one 16-year-old girl engage in sexual training with both him and his son, although on separate occasions.

“Carter took partially nude and pornographic photographs of (the girl) alone and with another prostitute with his Sprint cellular telephone, which he then downloaded to his computer and posted with prostitution advertisements…on the internet website, craigslist.org. Carter instructed CWl how to pose for the photographs,” according to a criminal complaint filed in the case.

Customers would pay either $150 or $200 for the services, depending on what they wanted. The prostitutes would be driven to their “dates” in the rented cars that Carter used and traveled to Minnesota and Iowa to peddle their wares and parts of their anatomy.

Violence was not uncommon, with fights breaking out between the pimps and prostitutes at various times, according to the complaint.

A prostitute who later was a confidential witness in the case, the complaint said, “tried to stab another prostitute with a knife from the kitchen. Harrison knocked the knife out of CWl’s hand. CWl kicked Harrison, Harrison hit CWl with a skillet, and then CWl struck her head on the sink.”

There was an alleged upside, though.

“Carter instructed (the girl) to advise another underage girl on the benefits of the prostitution lifestyle, such as manicures and getting your hair styled,” according to the complaint.

Gary George denied early freedom from supervised release (maybe)

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

Gary George apparently, maybe has been denied eary release from supervised release, according to a really confusing docket entry in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Back on Aug. 6, US District Judge Rudolph T. Randa gave the federal probation office 30 days to respond to George’s request to be allowed to freely travel to make movies and money.

This docket entry was made Sept. 9:

DOCKET ANNOTATION as to Gary R George: Court denied defendant’s motion to term his supervised release in a memo from Probation. (Zik, Linda) (Entered: 09/09/2008) 

Judge’s don’t usually make rulings in memos from somebody else.

George was sentenced in August 2004 to four years in prison and three years supervised release for his role in a kickback scheme.

McGee says he will accept responsibility

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Former Ald. Michael McGee said last week that he will accept responsibility for his actions when he is sentenced next month for bribery and extortion.

“I first want to express my complete regret, sorrow, and responsibility for the charges I was recently convicted of,” he said in a 12-page letter to US District Judge Charles N. Clevert. “At sentencing, I will publically acknowledge my role as well as write you.”

McGee last month asked to be released pending his Oct. 24 sentencing. The US attorney’s office opposes the request.

McGee said in his latest letter that defense lawyer Calvin Malone did not present critical information.

“If you, or previous judges would have had all facts surrounding allegations that my behavior is indicative of a dangerous individual, I believe I would be out on bail,” he wrote.

McGee, whose extra-marital activities are a matter of public record, said he is a “family man – who has made mistakes in my marriage. I am not a rough, disrespectful, or violent person. I have dedicated my whole life to creating an atmosphere of peace and respect for each other – amongst individuals. I am not a drug dealer or gang member, nor am I loosely affiliated with illegal enterprises. I have, as well as my family — suffered through this whole experience humiliation.”

McGee, in his letter, discusses Jack Adel, a key government witness. McGee denies that he tried to block a block party organized by Adel and another figure in the case against him.

“The block party in question was requested at the same intersection where a twelve year old was killed in a hit and run accident,” McGee said. “Out of respect for the public and neighborhood outcry for traffic signals and safety precautions at the aforemention intersection, I respectfully requested that the planned event be moved to a block not widely traveled; or to the neighborhood school’s playground.”

McGee also denied ordering a “hit” on a man suspected in a break-in, and said slang language he used in conversation was taken out of context.

“Your honor, I have suffered greatly both physically and pyschologically since my incarceration on May, 28, 2007. I have been housed in three (3) facilities, and kept in the ‘hole’ for seven (7) months because of the ‘high’ profile nature and protection of my person. I have lost over 30 pounds and contracted shingles.”

Gary George seeks early out from supervised release

Wednesday, August 13th, 2008

Gary George, the convicted corrupt politician, wants early release from the supervised release part of his sentence so he can travel to make movies and consult.

“At minimum, I would ask to be released from the travel restrictions,” George wrote in a letter to US District Judge Rudolph T.  Randa. “However, I would ask the Court to recognize no need for further supervision at this juncture. In addition, as I will be authorized to begin practicing law again upon the completion of the reapplication process, which I am now undertaking, my duty to clients, including the duty of confidentiality, may conflict with my responsibilities under extended supervision.”

George was sentenced in August 2004 to four years in prison and three years supervised release for his role in a kickback scheme.

The probation and parole office hasn’t yet weighed in on the request, but the US attorney’s office opposes it.

“Mr George still has in excess of $439,000 in outstanding restitution obligations. the past nine months,” US  Attorney Steven Biskupic wrote. “Mr. George has done nothing to reduce this balance other than bare minimum of $300 a month required by the Amended Judgment.”

Biskupic took note of George’s desire to travel and to begin practicing law again. ”Both of these stated motives give pause. Mr. George’s underlying criminal conduct involved abuses of his law practice and laundering money in the Virgin Islands,” Biskupic said. ”As indicated, the supervised release term provides protection against Mr. George’s return to criminal conduct.”

George’s conduct during and after his trial also argues against early release from supervised release, Biskupic said.

“The record fails to establish that Mr. George fully accepts responsibility for his underlying conduct,” he wrote. “As the Court will recall, despite a plea of guilty, Mr. George persisted in arguing that he was not really guilty of a federal crime. He also contended that he had been unfairly targeted for prosecution. This posture continued on appeal.”