Posts Tagged ‘Doyle’

WisDOT attack on property owners dropped from budget

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

Gov. Jim Doyle’s attempt to strip homeowners and other property owners of legal rights in condemnation disputes with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation was dropped from the proposed 2009-11 budget after key lawmakers determined that the proposal was a policy issue, not a budgetary one.

Doyle wanted to make it harder and more expensive for property owners to appeal WisDOT low-ball offers for private property the agency wanted to take over to make way for transportation projects. The proposal would have limited lawyer’s fees for property owners who take their cases to court and win, thus leaving property owners hugely wronged by WisDOT with the prospect of large lawyer bills for taking on the state.

TIF for street repairs? Maybe not such a great idea

Monday, March 30th, 2009

While Gov. Doyle commits to spend billions to widen freeways that don’t need widening, city streets are falling apart. The situation is dire and aldermen are getting desperate to come up with some way of making things better or at least slow the descent into much, much worse.

Ald. Jim Bohl came up with an idea that will increase funding for street repairs by, in a roundabout way, increasing property tax rates for non-city units of government like the county, school district, Milwaukee Area Technical College and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District.

Bohl wants to use TIF district funds to pay for street repairs. TIFs are an economic development tool that allows municipalities to borrow to make improvements in an area, then use the new property tax revenue generated through the improvements and subsequent private development to pay off the loan. The borrowing municipality — in this case, Milwaukee — gets to use all of the new property tax money to pay down the loan instead of distributing the revenue to other taxing units as is customary.

Bohl’s idea — received warmly by several other aldermen — is to increase project costs within some or all of the city’s 48 TIF districts and use the extra money to fund street repairs outside of the districts, but within a half-mile of their borders, something state law allows. The city gets to keep the money generated by the TIF a little longer to pay off whatever the street work costs.

The other taxing units still need to collect the full amount of their levies and other property taxpayers simply will have to come up with more money to make up for the amount the city is withholding — they will, in short, be taxed at a higher rate because of the city’s keeping the TIF funds to pay for street repairs.

Yes, the streets really, really need fixing and Bohl is at least making an effort to get the damned streets fixed. Unless I’m really missing something, though, Bohl’s plan essentially would force other units of governments to put the cost of the street projects on their tax levies. This does not seem like a development likely to foster goodwill and cameraderie amongst all those starving local units of governments who can barely cover their own expenses.

Road-builders pouring concrete and money on the ground all over the state are having a good chuckle, though. No starvation worries for them. They’re eating well at the state trough.

Day care swipe cards — really?

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Gov. Jim Doyle is recommending that parents be required to use swipe cards to indicate when their children enter and leave day care, according to the JS.

What about the children who go to school and then go to day care? They are picked up at school by day care center vans. (A friend describes a school inundated by more than 40 vans at the end of every school day.) How will parents log those children into day care? Will they give the cards to their four-year-olds to swipe for themselves?

Doyle’s proposal appears to lack a full understanding of the day care situation in our fair city, which would not be a first for Doyle’s comprehension of Milwaukee. It is early, though, and the JS did not carry full details of the proposal so perhaps there already exists some sort of accommodation. If not, there still is time to fix glaring problems like this.

WisDOT slaps Obama

Monday, February 9th, 2009

It’s hard to figure: a governor who endorsed Barack Obama for president when it was a semi-risky thing to do is letting his transportation department show total disrespect for the man now that he holds the highest office in the land.

President Obama had made a few priorities absolutely clear: this country must reduce both greenhouse gases and dependency on foreign oil.

Gov. Jim Doyle’s WisDOT, in planning for a new Zoo Interchange, is taking a real slap at the president by totally ignoring those priorities. There will be no planning for any transit to be incorporated into the new design, nor will there be a freeway / transit alternatives analysis done, despite the city’s request.

It’s a road-only study — more greenhouse gases, more dependency on foreign oil. Guess the governor doesn’t like the president all that much.

And why is this plan roads only? Because of a timeline Gov. Jim Doyle set when he was running for re-election and worried that the Republicans would criticize him for not rebuilding the Zoo Interchange before embarking on the North-South I-94 project. There is no valid engineering, environmental or geopolitical argument against including transit in the Zoo Interchange project. The opposite is true. The region, state and country would be better off if transportation planning included transit. That a project this big doesn’t isn’t just a slap at the president and his priorities — it’s a slap at all of us.

Is the state deficit real?

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

The Journal Sentinel reports today that Republicans in the State Legislature are questioning Gov. Doyle’s projection of a $3 billion budget gap. Partisan arguing can go on all day about whether the state should use budget request as a basis for the projection, but there is no doubt that the state is going to be looking into a deep, deep hole for the 2007-09 budget, just like school districts and municipalities are.

Here’s how Paul Vornholt, the city’s chief lobbyist, put it last week during a city budget hearing.

“The rhetoric behind the scenes from DOA (the State Department of Administration) and the governor’s office is that this will be the worst deficit he’s faced since he’s been in office,”  Vornholt told the Finance and Personnel Committee.

Vornholt said he was hopeful that there would be some improvement in state shared revenue funding for the city. The city’s basic strategy, though, is about preserving what it has: “First you play defense — don’t hurt me, don’t cut me,” he said.