Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’

Obama and the peace prize

Friday, December 11th, 2009

There is that irony of a war president winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

It is beyond irony — beyond comprehension, really — that the prize was awarded to a man who has decided to overlook the crimes committed by those in government service who sanctioned torture.

President Barack Obama, in giving these felons a pass, said it’s time to look forward, not back.

But everything in the justice system is a look back. Common criminals go to prison for what they have done in the past. That is what it is about.

Drug abusers go to prison.

Obama goes to Sweden to collect his prize.

American torturers go about their business.

WisDOT slaps Obama

Monday, February 9th, 2009

It’s hard to figure: a governor who endorsed Barack Obama for president when it was a semi-risky thing to do is letting his transportation department show total disrespect for the man now that he holds the highest office in the land.

President Obama had made a few priorities absolutely clear: this country must reduce both greenhouse gases and dependency on foreign oil.

Gov. Jim Doyle’s WisDOT, in planning for a new Zoo Interchange, is taking a real slap at the president by totally ignoring those priorities. There will be no planning for any transit to be incorporated into the new design, nor will there be a freeway / transit alternatives analysis done, despite the city’s request.

It’s a road-only study — more greenhouse gases, more dependency on foreign oil. Guess the governor doesn’t like the president all that much.

And why is this plan roads only? Because of a timeline Gov. Jim Doyle set when he was running for re-election and worried that the Republicans would criticize him for not rebuilding the Zoo Interchange before embarking on the North-South I-94 project. There is no valid engineering, environmental or geopolitical argument against including transit in the Zoo Interchange project. The opposite is true. The region, state and country would be better off if transportation planning included transit. That a project this big doesn’t isn’t just a slap at the president and his priorities — it’s a slap at all of us.

Karl Rove, man of substance

Friday, January 30th, 2009

The former political genius, now a diabolical lawn gnome, complains about President Obama’s office arrangements and work habits.

Like there are no real issues to tackle? This may be one of the early signs that absolutely nothing about the Obama administration is too insignificant for the right to attack. From the Wall Street Journal (thanks to Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire).

Under Mr. Obama, the political director won’t be in the EEOB, where other presidents have placed him. He’ll occupy a West Wing office usually given to the head of presidential personnel. That’s a sign of the importance of politics for Team Obama.

This is one of many of Mr. Obama’s changes to the management structure of the White House that will likely undermine his stated aims and create a more centralized and possibly incoherent policy process.

Another first to have a West Wing office is the incoming secretary of Health and Human Services, Tom Daschle. Once sworn in, he will be the first domestic cabinet secretary to have a desk in the most coveted office space in government — to use in his other job as director of the White House Office of Health Reform.

This dual role centralizes policy-making inside the White House because it allows Mr. Daschle to displace the Domestic Policy Council and the National Economic Council on developing health-care policy.

Tapping Carol Browner as climate czar also centralizes decision making. Her role will displace the leadership of the Council on Environmental Quality and diminish the influence of the Environmental Protection Agency….

Mr. Obama’s management decisions may lead to more intrusive, larger government policies gaining traction. Why? Because left-leaning aides will be unimpeded by the White House’s budget director or cabinet secretaries as they push new policies….

Mr. Obama’s tendency to work late into the night will also pose problems. Politico.com reports that the White House staff is “preparing for a return to long nights, heavy weekend shifts.” Requiring a senior staff that meets at 7:30 a.m. to work until 11 p.m. or 12 a.m. will quickly cause burnout and diminish the quality of advice and oversight.

Go, Obama!

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

I wish I was ecstatic, but relieved and hopeful will do for now.

A must for Obama

Monday, January 19th, 2009

A huge “must” for President-elect Barack Obama is cleaning up the corruption and cronyism so loved and embraced by the Bush administration.

And then he has to ensure that it doesn’t happen again on his watch.

This means that people will go to jail. This means that Obama will get knocked for being vengeful and partisan and it means that maybe the stimulus money doesn’t get, figuratively speaking, dumped out of an airplane to get lost in the wind like that first $350 billion did. If Obama doesn’t act — if no-bid contracts continue to be awarded to friends and campaign contributors, then corruption becomes institutionalized. We may never be able to recover from that.