The sound, grating and enormously loud, was unexpected. I turned my head and there it was — a semi-truck jammed under the I-94 Mitchell Blvd. overpass.
It was early yet, 6:30 or 7 or 7:30 in the morning or something like that. Abe wouldn’t go on a walk this morning, so it was just Tennie and me crossing Mitchell Blvd. when the semi hit. It’s not unusual for semi drivers to bang their trailers on the overpass. There are warning signs all over the place, but drivers “in the zone” don’t even see them. Usually a little bit of the trailer top is peeled away before the driver stops. Then the deputies come and help the driver maneuver out of his predicament and give him a ticket.
Today was different. Right after the accident, there was a moment of silence, probably while the driver passed from denial to the “oh, sh–” stage.
It was a remarkable sight. The trailer was jammed under the overpass. He didn’t just bank his trailer front on the overpass. His truck was wedged tightly underneath it.
The drive tried to move his rig forward. Tires spun, but nothing else moved. He tried again. He tried rocking the rig a few times.
And then he tried to back up. And his trailer just buckled.
Wow.
A few more seconds passed and then he got out of his ruined truck, talking on his cell phone. I can only imagine who he was calling and what he was saying.
Tennessee Petunia and I continued on our walk. By the time we started back, emergency crews were on the scene.
(Click on the pics to see larger images. There is a clearly visible and readable sign on the overpass in the fourth picture. Oh, sweet irony.)
About four or five hour later, when I went back for another peek, the crews and the truck were still there. The truck was looking a little different, though. Look ma, no cab. Look pa, no front tires.
This is the best ever jam job under the Mitchell Blvd. overpass. Most def.




WisDOT: see no global warming, speak no global warming, mitigate no global warming
Tuesday, June 15th, 2010The I-94 North-South reconstruction and lunatic expansion project is well underway. It’s cost is projected by the state to be $1.9 billion, but that is a remarkably and deceptively low figure. It does not take into account, for example, the interest payments the state will have to pay on bonding for the project. It also does not take into account costs that We Energies ratepayers will pay for moving utility infrastructure.
How much will interest and utilities cost us? Don’t know — the Wisconsin Department of Transportation has long believed that interest payments aren’t real money, even when they cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars per year. It’s likely that WisDOT doesn’t even know what it will end up paying in interest — one of the conveniences of working at the agency is that you get to start projects without having a clue as to how you are going to pay to finish them. If you run short of cash, you just borrow more, or cut highway maintenance, or raise taxes to fill in the gap.
One of the true horror shows of the I-94 North-South project is that WisDOT chose to ignore the impacts of global warming when it was making plans to build it. Yes, WisDOT said, adding an extra lane to the freeway will add to global emissions, but we don’t know precisely how much it will add, so we are just going to ignore the matter entirely and propose absolutely nothing to mitigate the consequences of increased global warming.
Now a new study from the Federal Highway Administration shows the impacts of global warming on roads and highways. They are many and mostly negative and the laundry list of potential bad things to come is one helluva strong argument for WisDOT to greatly increase its highway maintenance (and repair) budget. Unfortunately, WisDOT generally is moving in the opposite direction, as illustrated by the emergency Zoo Interchange bridge replacement: do nothing until the bridges are ready to fall down, then spend an extraordinary amount to fix problems that could have been prevented for much less.
The new FHWA publication says the Midwest, including Wisconsin, will likely see much wetter winters and springs:
By far the largest seasonal increase in precipitation is projected to occur during the winter months, with an average increase of 6 to 7% and a likely range of +2 to +12% (USGCRP 2009). Annual mean precipitation in Chicago is projected to experience precipitation increases in line with the regional estimates (Hellmann et al. 2007). Heavy precipitation events are also projected to increase during this time, with the frequency of spring rainfall heavy downpours increasing by almost 15% in Missouri, Illinois, and Minnesota under a high emission scenario (A1Fi) compared with 1961-1990 (Union of Concerned Scientists 2009a). In the next two decades, heavy rains are projected to increase by 66% in St. Paul, 35% in Indianapolis, and 20% in Chicago (Union of Concerned Scientists 2009). These increases are expected to increase flooding and overload many drainage systems (USGCRP 2009).
That is bad news for highways. A jump in the number of heavy precipitation events has these consequences:
It’s worth noting that WisDOT proposed steeper center-to-shoulder grades for the new I-94, which will send more contaminated runoff, faster, on to properties that are closer to the wider freeway.
Changes in seasonal precipitation and stream flow patterns have additional results:
More very hot days could lead to:
Taken as a package, those are pretty devastating consequences that will cost Wisconsin residents billions of dollars. WisDOT, by embracing projects and politics that maximize the impacts of global warming, will suck up a larger and larger share of overall tax collections to fix what it has wrecked.
On the plus side, from WisDOT’s perspective, is this: warmer temperatures mean longer construction seasons for highway builders to wreak more havoc on the rest of us.
Posted in Commentary, Environment, Federal government, Freeways, News, WisDOT | 1 Comment »