Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Tree tree measure passes — start complaining

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

The Common Council voted yesterday to have the city pay for replacing sidewalk slabs damaged by roots from city-owned trees — but only if residents complain about it.

Residents who do not complain will still be assessed 50% of the cost of replacing the damaged sidewalk if the replacement is done as part of a larger project, such as the sidewalk replacement project in Story Hill last fall.

Aldermen Michael Murphy and Joe Dudzik voted against the measure, sponsored by Ald. Robert Bauman.

Murphy, who represents the Story Hill neighborhood on the Common Council, said the ordinance could cause “huge financial problems for the city.”

The city estimates the measure will cost a maximum of $50,000, but Murphy was skeptical of that figure.

“There’s going to be a lot of unfairness in the system,” Murphy said in an interview. Some residents will be unaware of the ordinance and won’t request that their sidewalks be replaced. Homeowners hit with a special assessment for a sidewalk replacement project probably won’t be particularly happy if their neighbors did not have to pay for similar work simply because they complained.

Residents who notice city sidewalk slabs damaged by the roots of city-owned trees may be able to avoid future special assessments of several hundred dollars (depending on the number of slabs damaged) by contacting the Department of Public Works and requesting a slab replacement.

Federal accounting just a mess

Monday, March 1st, 2010

The federal government is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to get us out of this recession, and promises to keep strict track of where it is going and how it is spent.

It’s just all those other trillions that the feds can’t fully explain.

Government bookkeeping is so bad that the Government Accountability Office can’t determine just exactly what our national fiscal condition is.

“Certain material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and other limitations on the scope of our work resulted in conditions that prevented us from expressing an opinion on the fiscal year 2009 and 2008 financial statements other than the Statements of Social Insurance,” Acting Comptroller Gene L. Dodaro reported last week, adding that “Material weaknesses resulted in ineffective internal control over financial reporting (including safeguarding of assets).”

Makes you feel happy about paying those federal income taxes, doesn’t it?

Reading Dodaro’s statement makes you wonder why some of these people have jobs. The GAO, Dodaro said, can’t render an opinion on the government’s financial statements for three big reasons:

(1) serious financial management problems at the Department of Defense (DOD) that have prevented DOD’s financial statements from being auditable, (2) the federal government’s inability to adequately account for and reconcile intragovernmental activity and balances between federal agencies, and (3) the federal government’s ineffective
process for preparing the consolidated financial statements. In addition, the financial statements of the Department of Homeland Security and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were not auditable or were not subjected to audit by agency auditors.

The federal government could not determine exactly how much in “improper payments” it was making, although the amount is estimated at $98 billion, nor could the government ”reasonably assure” that appropriate action is being taken to stop them.

The government also could not identify and resolve information security control deficencies or — ready for this one? — “effectively manage its tax collection activities.”

The GAO sounds a very loud warning that both parties in Congress have thus far elected to ignore:

Looking ahead, the federal government will need to determine the most expeditious manner in which to bring closure to its financial stabilization initiatives while optimizing its investment returns. In addition to managing these actions, problems in the nation’s financial sector have exposed serious weaknesses in the current U.S. financial regulatory system, which, if not effectively addressed, may cause the system to fail to prevent similar or even worse crises in the future. The current system, which was put into place over the past 150 years, is fragmented and complex and simply has not kept pace with the major financial structures, innovations, and products that emerged during the years leading up to the recent financial crisis. Consequently, meaningful financial regulatory reform is of utmost concern.

All this is really scary stuff, brought to the country by one of the most credible sources there is. Anybody in Washington listening?

Complain early, complain often

Friday, February 19th, 2010

A Common Council committee on Thursday recommended, 3-1, that the city pay for sidewalk replacements damaged by city-owned trees, but only in the isolated instances when property owners complain about the damage.

Property owners are now billed for 50% of the cost of all sidewalk slab replacements.

Ald. Joe Dudzik voted agains the measure.

Property owners still would be assessed for replacing city tree-damaged sidewalks if the replacement was part of an area sidewalk maintenance and repair project, as occurred in Story Hill last fall, or if it was part of a paving project, under the recommendation of the Public Works Committee.

Ald. Robert Bauman originally proposed that the city replace any sidewalk slab that was damaged by a city-owned tree — such damage usually occurs when tree roots dislodge or raise a sidewalk slab.

Bauman, though, added language sharply limiting the potential city-paid sidewalk slab replacements after colleagues questioned where the $25,000 to $50,000 estimated annual cost of the measure.

If the full Common Council approves the measure, property owners would best off if they complain to the city as soon as they notice that sidewalk slabs adjoining their properties are affected by city tree roots. Waiting until the city schedules a sidewalk replacement project would only expose property owners to a special assessment.

City to consider free fixes for city tree-damaged sidewalks

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

Ald. Robert Bauman is sponsoring a measure that would exempt property owners from  assessments for new sidewalk sections if the sidewalk damage necessitating replacement is caused by city trees.

The measure is expected to be considered today by the Common Council’s Public Works Committee.

South-of-Bluemound Rd. Story Hill property owners got new sidewalks last in the fall and will be looking at sizeable special assessments for those sidewalks on their next property bills.

Some of the old sidewalks were damaged by roots from city trees — as the trees grew, the roots pushed up the sidewalk slabs. The city’s attitude was basically “too bad, so sad” — the adjoining property owner was liable for 50% of the cost of the replacement sidewalk slab. That is the standard sidewalk assessment rate.

Any chance of making the “city tree exemption” retroactive?

City task force recommends single stream recycling

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

A city task force is recommending the city adopt single stream recycling that would not require residents to separate recyclable materials.

The Recycling Task Force also is recommending that the city immediately adopt a three-week recycling collection schedule and implement a “pay-as-you-throw” system under which, in its most common form, the city would charge residents for garbage carts but provide recycling carts for free.

17 percent diversion from residential trash is the average, which is generally divided
equally among recycling, yard waste and source reduction.”

“The PAYT program results in a decrease in the trash tonnage and increase in recycling tonnage. A 16 to 17 percent diversion from residential trash is the average, which is generally divided equally among recycling, yard waste and source reduction,” the task force said in its report.

The city collects recyclables once a month from 95-gallon carts in 85% of the city and weekly from 18-gallon bins in the other 15%. The system in the bulk of the city uses divided recycling carts, with one-half reserved for containers and the other half reserved for paper. The larger carts generally are not big enough to hold a month’s worth of recyclables, particularly for newspaper subscribers.

The task force’s report is scheduled to be discussed Thursday by the Common Council’s Public Works Committee.

Recycling by city residents has declined sharply.

Recycling by city residents has declined sharply.

Source: Recycling Task Force Final Report and Recommendations to the Common Council

The single stream recommendation, if adopted, would eliminate the need for divided recycling carts.

“Single stream recycling is more user friendly because the public can simply consolidate all recyclables in the home and place them all in one cart without further sorting,” the task force said in its report. “The recycling industry is moving toward single stream recycling nationwide. Single stream can accommodate fully automated collection, which improves efficiency by allowing carts to be serviced without the driver exiting the vehicle.”

Under a single stream recycling program, recyclables would be sorted after they are collected. The task force recommended  two options for handling the materials after they are collected — one recommendation assumes the city would work on its own and the other assumes it would team up with Waukesha County and Wauwatosa to develop a materials recycling facility.