Archive for the ‘Federal government’ Category

How ending the tax cuts would affect you

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

The Washington Post has a very slick interactive graphic showing how the various federal tax proposals would affect various folks at various income levels.  We’re all going to pay more taxes — that is inevitable — it’s just nice to have a neat little computer doo-dad to play with to ease the pain.

Wisconsin makes out nicely in federal highway money

Monday, August 9th, 2010

Wisconsin received $1.22 in federal highway aid for every dollar it contributed in federal highway taxes, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

The report looked at highway funding since 2005.

Wisconsin was not alone in the windfall. From the GAO:

For the time period for which data are available, every state received as much or more funding for highway programs than they contributed to the Highway Account of the trust fund. This was possible because more funding was authorized and apportioned than was collected from the states and the fund needed to be augmented with general revenues.

That makes it official, folks. The old road builders’ argument that “transportation projects are paid for with transportation dollars” is officially garbage.

$78 billion needed to fix country’s transit systems

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

And there is no real help in sight, according to the The New York Times.

Wow.

And in Wisconsin, we are expanding freeways instead of preserving transit. It is a really sick philosophy: transit riders can wait forever in the heat or cold for their bus; car drivers in their temperature-controlled vehicles should never be delayed at all on the freeway.

What would a basic ethics class make out of that one?

WisDOT: see no global warming, speak no global warming, mitigate no global warming

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

The I-94 North-South reconstruction and lunatic expansion project is well underway. It’s cost is projected by the state to be $1.9 billion, but that is a remarkably and deceptively low figure. It does not take into account, for example, the interest payments the state will have to pay on bonding for the project. It also does not take into account costs that We Energies ratepayers will pay for moving utility infrastructure.

How much will interest and utilities cost us? Don’t know — the Wisconsin Department of Transportation has long believed that interest payments aren’t real money, even when they cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars per year.  It’s likely that WisDOT doesn’t even know what it will end up paying in interest — one of the conveniences of working at the agency is that you get to start projects without having a clue as to how you are going to pay to finish them. If you run short of cash, you just borrow more, or cut highway maintenance, or raise taxes to fill in the gap.

One of the true horror shows of the I-94 North-South project is that WisDOT chose to ignore the impacts of global warming when it was making plans to build it. Yes, WisDOT said, adding an extra lane to the freeway will add to global emissions, but we don’t know precisely how much it will add, so we are just going to ignore the matter entirely and propose absolutely nothing to mitigate the consequences of increased global warming.

Now a new study from the Federal Highway Administration shows the impacts of global warming on roads and highways. They are many and mostly negative and the laundry list of potential bad things to come is one helluva strong argument for WisDOT to greatly increase its highway maintenance (and repair) budget. Unfortunately, WisDOT generally is moving in the opposite direction, as illustrated by the emergency Zoo Interchange bridge replacement: do nothing until the bridges are ready to fall down, then spend an extraordinary amount to fix problems that could have been prevented for much less.

The new FHWA publication says the Midwest, including Wisconsin, will likely see much wetter winters and springs:

By far the largest seasonal increase in precipitation is projected to occur during the winter months, with an average increase of 6 to 7% and a likely range of +2 to +12% (USGCRP 2009). Annual mean precipitation in Chicago is projected to experience precipitation increases in line with the regional estimates (Hellmann et al. 2007). Heavy precipitation events are also projected to increase during this time, with the frequency of spring rainfall heavy downpours increasing by almost 15% in Missouri, Illinois, and Minnesota under a high emission scenario (A1Fi) compared with 1961-1990 (Union of Concerned Scientists 2009a). In the next two decades, heavy rains are projected to increase by 66% in St. Paul, 35% in Indianapolis, and 20% in Chicago (Union of Concerned Scientists 2009). These increases are expected to increase flooding and overload many drainage systems (USGCRP 2009).

That is bad news for highways. A jump in the number of heavy precipitation events has these consequences:

  • Increases in weather-related delays and traffic disruptions
  • Increased flooding of evacuation routes
  • Increases in flooding of roadways and tunnels
  • Increases in road washout, landslides, and mudslides that damage roadways
  • Drainage systems likely to be overloaded more frequently and severely, causing backups and street flooding
  • Areas where flooding is already common will face more frequent and severe problems
  • If soil moisture levels become too high, structural integrity of roads, bridges, and tunnels (especially where they are already under stress) could be compromised
  • Standing water may have adverse effects on road base
  • Increased peak streamflow could affect scour rates and influence the size requirement for bridges and culverts

It’s worth noting that WisDOT proposed steeper center-to-shoulder grades for the new I-94, which will send more contaminated runoff, faster, on to properties that are closer to the wider freeway.

Changes in seasonal precipitation and stream flow patterns have additional results:

  • Benefits for safety and reduced interruptions if frozen precipitation shifts to rainfall
  • Increased risk of floods, landslides, gradual failures and damage to roads if precipitation changes from snow to rain in winter and spring thaws
  • Increased variation in wet/dry spells and decrease in available moisture may cause road foundations to degrade
  • Degradation, failure, and replacement of road structures due to increases in ground and foundation movement, shrinkage and changes in groundwater
  • Increased maintenance and replacement costs of road infrastructure
  • Short-term loss of public access or increased congestion to sections of road and highway
  • Changes in access to floodplains during construction season and mobilization periods
  • Changes in wetland location and the associated natural protective services that wetlands offer to infrastructure

More very hot days could lead to:

  • Increased thermal expansion of bridge joints and paved surfaces, causing possible degradation
  • Concerns regarding pavement integrity, traffic-related rutting and migration of liquid asphalt, greater need for maintenance of roads and pavement
  • Maintenance and construction costs for roads and bridges; stress on bridge integrity due to temperature expansion of concrete joints, steel, asphalt, protective cladding, coats, and sealants
  • Asphalt degradation, resulting in possible short-term loss of public access or increased congestion of sections of road and highway during repair and replacement
  • Limits on periods of construction activity, and more nighttime work
  • Vehicle overheating and tire degradation

Taken as a package, those are pretty devastating consequences that will cost Wisconsin residents billions of dollars. WisDOT, by embracing projects and politics that maximize the impacts of global warming, will suck up a larger and larger share of overall tax collections to fix what it has wrecked.

On the plus side, from WisDOT’s perspective, is this: warmer temperatures mean longer construction seasons for highway builders to wreak more havoc on the rest of us.

Census long form

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

No disrespect to the federal government (except for the oil spill, the wars, Congress, etc.), but the folks who designed the American Community Survey questionnaire must be flippin’ out of their minds.

The first thing it does is ask for your name and phone number, in case the feds want to call. Now that’s reassuring.

I’m sitting at the dining room table trying to race through it.

Didn’t want to fill it out in the first place.

My attitude isn’t good: this stuff is not the federal government’s business.

What is my race? How many bedrooms in my house? When did I buy my house? What was my gas bill last month? What was my electric bill last month?

Let’s stop and think about that for a moment. What was my utility bill? Can’t remember, exactly. How much of that was gas? How much was electricity? We Energies doesn’t bill exactly by the month. I could look all this stuff up, but naaah. Just ballpark it.

What good is knowing what a single month’s gas bill was? What about the other 11 months?

What is my house worth? What are my property taxes? How much is my mortgage? How much are my monthly mortgage payments? How much did I pay for water and sewer over the last year?

Wow — do they really expect me to remember what my last four water bills were? And why do I need a year’s worth of water charges, but only a month’s worth of utility bills?

The census people presumably expect Milwaukee respondents to go back through a year’s worth of bills and take out all the other charges the city now dumps on them. That ain’t going to happen in my house. Move on.

Am I deaf? Am I blind? Do I speak a foreign language? How many times have I been married? Do I have trouble dressing or bathing? Who do I work for? At what street address? How much did I make in wages last year? How much did I make in dividends and interest?

Intrusive questions. Don’t really know the answers to some and, given my druthers, wouldn’t answer anyway. The  coercion behind the US government mandating my cooperation really is irritating.

My own questions and answers: Do I feel very invested in this? No. Do I just want to get it done and over with? Yup. Are my replies accurate? Well….yes, if I knew the answers off the top of my head. The rest are just guesstimates that I figure are at least as accurate as the early government estimates of the rate of leakage from the gulf oil catastrophe.

Do I think I’m fairly typical of the innocent folks mandated to fill out this stupid form? Yes.

Should federal officials base any sort of policy on the results of a too-complex survey filled out by resentful people who do not know all of the answers?

No. But they will.