Which is worse?

Additional debit card fees or a monthly fee for not having enough money in the bank?

Both are big-bank options to maintain unsightly profit levels as regulators crack down on other awful (remember the housing collapse?), yet profitable, bank practices, according to the Huffington Post.

Citigroup Inc said it will start charging a monthly fee of $10 on checking and savings accounts with combined balances of less than $1,500, joining a growing list of banks seeking to recoup revenue lost under new financial industry regulations.

The fee will be waived if a customer completes one direct deposit and one online bill payment per month through an account, or maintains a balance of at least $1,500 in checking and savings accounts, Citigroup said on Friday….

Citigroup said it will not charge for debit card use or online bill payment.

Stephen Troutner, head of banking products for Citi’s U.S. consumer bank, said free debit card use could woo customers from other banks that are weighing whether to charge for debit card use, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Wells Fargo & Co.

 It’s odd, isn’t it, as income drops around the country, that things like bank fees go up. And why the fee waiver for people who pay bills online? Could be Citigroup’s way of clearing out what it considers the true riff-raff — those who don’t have Internet access; those folks frequently are poor.

Losing an opportunity

The economy collapsed in 2008.

Since then, the financial industry got billions, the auto industry was rescued, and the rest of us got the bills and not much else.

The financial industry is now strong enough to run the country for the rich. The auto industry is no longer on its last wheels.

But even the most obvious and urgently needed reforms remain undone.

Take the mortgage industry. Please.

Remember all the mortgage documentation problems that were revealed after the flood of foreclosures started drowning homeowners? Turns out the a lot of banks had screwed-up documentation for the properties they were taking “back.” Their work was so bad and fraudulent that sometimes they wrongly kicked people out of their houses. (Matt Taibbi had a great piece on this in Rolling Stone.)  The mess screamed for a regulatory fix.

But it didn’t happen.

The Government Accountability Office provided testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation and Community Development last month that just goes to show that it takes a whole government to ensure that nothing gets done. 

In the beginning, before the crash, regulators ignored the problems that were going to push the economy to the edge of the cliff. From the GAO testimony:

Until the problems with foreclosure documentation came to light, federal regulatory oversight of mortgage servicers had been limited, because regulators regarded servicers’ activities as low risk for banking safety and soundness.
That means it wasn’t sexy enough.
 
When it became clear that something was seriously wrong with the mortgage industry, regulators finally rushed in to…examine files! Again, the GAO:

These examinations revealed severe deficiencies in the preparation of foreclosure documentation and with the oversight of internal foreclosure processes
and the activities of external third-party vendors.
 
And then? Silence, mostly. Some enforcement actions were issued after the file review, but that’s about it.

 Regulators plan to assess compliance but have not fully developed plans for the extent of future oversight…they had not determined what changes would be made to guidance or to the extent and frequency of examinations. Moreover, regulators with whom we spoke expressed uncertainty about how their organizations would interact and share responsibility with the newly created CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) regarding oversight of mortgage servicing activities.

 CFPB staff members say that mortgage oversight will be a priority, but “as of April 2011, CFPB’s oversight plans had not been finalized.”

Some academics and industry insiders want national servicing standards established to that would require mortgage servicers to 1) sign statements that their mortgages met legal requirements and 2) commit them to try to modify loans before foreclosing, according to the GAO. But, guess what?

“The content of such standards and how they would be implemented is yet to be determined.”

The Conumer Financial Protection Bureau has until 2013 to issue mortgage servicing rules. That’s a long time to wait for something that should already be done.

Maybe next time we should do things in reverse. Don’t reward the crooked banks and financial firms who drove the country to the edge.

Work, instead, on fixing that damned cliff itself.

 
 
 
 
 

 

M&I’s absolute outrage

What a joke, travesty, injustice and outrage. What a screw job for share holders.

Mark Furlong, the M&I chief executive who piloted the bank to a shotgun wedding with BMO Financial Group, got a raise last year! The JS reports:

In a separate report with regulators Friday, M&I disclosed that Furlong received total compensation in 2010 of about $5 million, up more than 200% from almost $1.7 million in 2009. According to the company’s proxy statement, Furlong received a salary of $875,000, stock salary awards and restricted stock awards totaling $3,624,997, a change in the value of retirement benefits of $569,607 and other compensation of $24,432, for total compensation of $5,094,036. The biggest change from 2009 was in the stock awards.

BMO also is going to pay Furlong $18 million in a very big, wet, sloppy, full-tongue goodbye kiss.

The JS reported the story without a hint of irony although it really, to do the situation justice, should have dripped with sarcasm as it recounted the stellar results M&I achieved under Furlong’s leadership:

In its report Friday, M&I noted that nonperforming loans decreased 19% from the first quarter of 2010, and early-stage delinquencies fell 17% from the same quarter last year.

But the bank said write-offs of bad loans rose $8.9 million, or 2%, from last year’s first quarter – an increase M&I said was driven by the sale of a small-business portfolio. Net interest income was $352.1 million, down $57 million, or 14%.

M&I is the largest bank based in Wisconsin, with assets of $49.6 billion. However, it’s about 12% smaller than a year ago at the same time, when its assets were $56.7 billion.

Someone, quick, explain to your kids how thsis fits in with the concept of justice and consequences.

Read it and weep, workers of Wisconsin

There’s a reason you’ve got that screwed-over feeling.

From USA Today:

The heads of the nation’s top companies got the biggest raises in recent memory last year after taking a hiatus during the recession.

 At a time most employees can barely remember their last substantial raise, median CEO pay jumped 27% in 2010 as the executives’ compensation started working its way back to prerecession levels, a USA TODAY analysis of data from GovernanceMetrics International found. Workers in private industry, meanwhile, saw their compensation grow just 2.1% in the 12 months ended December 2010, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Two years of scaling back amid tough economic times proved temporary as three-quarters of CEOs got raises in 2010 — and, in many cases, the increases were substantial.