Milwaukee Water Works’ bad idea approved for suburbs, too

The Milwaukee Water Works’ really bad proposal to gives incentive to companies  to waste water was approved by the Public Service Commission last week and, over the objections of the city, extended to suburban communities that buy water from the utility.

Yup, the city comes out with absolutely no net advantage with its new, screw-you-residential-ratepayer plan and avoids for at least another year dealing with the hard issue of excess capacity in its water system. Big water using ratepayers get an economic development rate discount; others get the bill for the city’s failure to deal with the issue.

A really, really bad aspect of this new discount is that the companies that get it don’t even have to show that new jobs they add have anything to do with the additional water that is going down the drain or with the rate break they are getting.

So much for Milwaukee city government trying to sell itself as “green.” Mayor Tom Barrett and the Common Council should be embarrassed about this one. Residential ratepayers and anyone who cares about the health of area waterways should be furious.

To qualify for the bad new discount, a new business must use 500,000 gallons of water per billing period, and an existing business must increase its water use per billing period from a baseline of at least 1 million gallons  to 2.5 million gallons, or by 50%, whichever is less.

A business seeking the discount must submit a water use and efficiency plan to the Water Works, and file an affidavit swearing that it would not increase water consumption without the encouragement of the economic development rate. (Emphasis added.) Enforcement of the plan? Water Works would be allowed to audit each recipient’s water use, but there is no mention of who would do the auditing. New staff? Doesn’t that cost money, requiring more revenue, requiring higher water rates? And if a company is caught cheating, it will have 90 days to stop. (“Really, officer? I was going a hundred miles over the limit? I promise I will slow down in three months.”)

The firm must create 25 jobs within 90 days of approval of the discount. There is no requirement that adding the jobs have anything to do with the additional water use or the water rate discount. There just needs to be 25 new jobs.

Let’s think about this one a little bit. Let’s say you are a big water-using-business planning to expand and add jobs. Wouldn’t you apply for the discount and wait until you know if you have gotten it before adding those jobs? It’s not a hard decision to make, since if you add them too soon, you won’t qualify for the discount! By waiting and adding the jobs later, you can get the discount that has nothing to do with the jobs you were going to add anyway. What a deal for the business! There is a downside, though, for the city: job creation may actually be put on hold until while the company waits for its free money to be confirmed.

And let’s say you are a new business that adds 600 jobs but only uses 400,000 gallons of water per billing period. What you get is — jack sh–! Too bad, buddy!

There are a few environmental requirements that must be met to qualify for the discount, but they are almost laughable. The Water Works must certify to the PSC that the additional consumption won’t hurt the water supply and that it will not increase water rates for other customers. If the latter is true — if the Water Works can lose revenue from one source without replacing it from another source — then it already is operating with a bloated budget and is overcharging customers and the PSC should re-examine the huge rate increases it just granted to the utility.

If  the Water Works must charge other customers more to recover what it loses by granting the discount, then it will either have to deny all discount applications or pass those costs on to other customers in the form of increased rates.

And how is the Water Works supposed to know the impacts of each business on the overall quality and health of the water system? Are cumulative impacts considered? It does not appear that they will be. So if each of 100 businesses receiving the discount has a negligible effect on Lake Michigan, but collectively they will destroy it, the collectively part of the equation will not be considered.

The Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, meanwhile, must certify that it can treat the increased wastewater without adversely affecting the operation of its plants or increasing charges to other customers. Given the flooding and overflows in recent years, how on earth could it possibly do that?

This is a crazy, bad plan. The Milwaukee Water Works how has the authority to implement the crazy, bad plan, but it is not required to do so. And it should not.

Not the biggest worry

Did you notice how slippery streets and sidewalks were Saturday morning? A thin sheet of glare ice covered just about every outdoor surface that wasn’t oversalted by the Milwaukee Department of Public Works.

To address the problem of icy walks in wintertime, Ald. Jim Bohl is taking on …. rain barrels.

Yup. Wow. Rain barrels, those major threats to health and happiness. Bohl is proposing new rain barrel requirements that will be taken up tomorrow by the Common Council’s Zoning, Neighborhoods and Development Committee.

From the proposed ordinance:

The use of a rain barrel is permitted provided the overflow discharge conforms to the requirements of roof rainwater discharge to finished grade or is designed to overflow to a treatment drain or storm water conveyance system. The requirements of roof rainwater discharge to finished grade are as follows:
1. Placement shall be a minimum of 2 feet from a basement or foundation wall of alley property line and 5 feet from all other property lines.
2. Discharge shall flow parallel to or away from the nearest property line.
3. The discharge water shall not discharge to a street, alley or other public way.
4. The discharge water shall not create an icy condition on any pedestrian walkways within or adjacent to the subject premises lot lines.

The language is very broad — what if the nearest yard is so far away the water would never get there? And what if sending the water in another direction would make icy matters worse?

This smacks of legislation written in response to an isolated complaint or three. Doesn’t the city have bigger  things to worry about?

Council to establish home energy audit subsidies

The city will subsidize about 3,000 home energy audits at a total cost of $1.2 million, under legislation to be considered Tuesday by the Common Council.

The effort is part of the city’s Milwaukee Energy Efficiency (Me2) program. The funding comes from a US Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant.

The city program, the which will be coordinated largely through the Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation, a Madison non-profit organization, according to city documents. WECC will develop a list of approved energy audit contractors, and the city will pay 75% of the cost of each home energy audit — up to $300 for a single family home or $500 for a two- to three-unit residential property — with the property owner paying the difference.

Property owners can get their share of energy audit costs, up to $100 for a single family home or $175 for a two- to three-unit residential property, rebated by completing the top three  recommended energy efficiency measures by spending at least $3,000 through a qualified Me2 contractor on energy efficiency improvements.

Grand Avenue a failure as regional mall, Marcoux says

The Shops at Grand Avenue failed as a regional mall, according Department of City Development Commissioner Rocky Marcoux.

“We should not put any more money into the Grand Avenue as a regional shopping mall,” he told the Common Council’s Finance and Personnel Committee last week.

The city has invested $40 million in the facility through two tax incremental districts, he said.

Marcoux said he’s met several times with representatives of Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp., the current owners of the mall.

“Every meeting resulted in an ask for more money,” he said.

The mall is scheduled to be sold at an Oct. 26 auction.

Marcoux said sale of the mall was not welcome news, but may provide an opportunity for the new owners to buy the mall at a price low enough to allow them a “cash cushion” to invest in the mall. Ashkenazy paid more for the mall than it is now worth, he said.

“This is not a regional mall, it’s never going to be a regional mall….It has failed as a regional destination” he said.

While the first floor should remain retail space, the second and third floors likely should be “repurposed,” he said.

If we could elevate the discussion just a little bit…

People on the losing side of the health care debate can be angry if they want. But come on, can’t we do better than name-calling?

From The Progress Report:

RADICAL RIGHT  — GOP LAWMAKERS DEFEND TEA PARTY PROTESTERS’ RACIAL, HOMOPHOBIC SLURS: Tea party activists protesting health care reform on Capitol Hill this weekend   hurled racist and homophobic slurs at members of Congress who planned on voting for the measure. Protesters chanted “the N-word, 15 times” at Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), a hero of the civil rights movement, and his colleague Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN). Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) was spit on, and someone yelled f—-t at openly-gay Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) as he walked through the Capitol complex on Saturday. Leaders of the Republican Party spent Sunday distancing themselves from from the outbursts. “Nobody condones that at all. There were 30,000 people here in Washington yesterday. And, yes, there were some very awful things said,” stated Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) on ABC. But some Republican members of Congress defended the protesters’ behavior. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) said Sunday that the remarks were understandable in light of “totalitarian tactics” used by Democrats that cause people to “begin to act crazy.” Rep. Steve King (R-IA), who was the sole dissenting votethe homophobic and racial slurs were “no big deal.” “I just don’t think it’s anything,” King said, adding that focusing on the incidents obscures “something that is determined to undermine the people.” King also claimed that he faced the same discrimination as the African-American and openly gay lawmakers. “There are a lot of places in this country that I couldn’t walk through,” King told Roll Call. “I wouldn’t live to get to the other end of it.” against recognizing the use of slave labor in the construction of the U.S. Capitol, implied that