Early prison release, reality and partisanship

You would think that the JS, given its tough, tough economic circumstances, would understand about other institutions facing tough, tough economic circumstances.

That is not the case, however, when it comes to the state’s early prisoner release program. There’s a non-story there, and the JS was all over it. The state is letting some non-violent offenders out of prison a month or two early.

Some of them — surprise! — re-offend.

Police Chief Edward Flynn complained to the paper that the state is increasing the city’s costs. The JS, journalistic watchdog that it is, does nothing to verify or investigate Flynn’s assertion — does the chief seriously believe that if these folks are held an extra month they won’t re-offend? That the city won’t be spending time and money re-arresting them?

The early release program is pretty much of a non-issue (at least until just one of the released inmates commits some heinous crime two weeks before his original release date — then political hay will be made until the cows come home to Wisconsin Avenue) blown out of proportion to create a faux scandal. If I were in Democratic Gov. Doyle’s administration, I would suspect the paper of having a partisan agenda.

Fortunately, in its totally even-handed manner, the paper carried, on the very same day, a total non-story about two State Department of Justice press releases. Republican J. B. Van Hollen’s shop borrowed wording from other agencies’ press releases about cases they worked together.

Stop the presses! Nothing amiss here!

Gee, think the paper has ever taken a few paragraphs from press releases?

That’s it for now. I must go out and, like the paper, shovel it.

2 thoughts on “Early prison release, reality and partisanship

  1. Gretchen, there’s a lot not to like about the way the reforms in WI Act 28 were implemented, especially the fact that some of the most violent inmates in the Wisconsin State Prison system are eligible for multiple early release tracks from prison, despite their histories of violent behavior in the community.

    I can certainly see the merit of early release for nonviolent drug and property crime offenders, but I fail to see how violent offenders should be eligible for early release, especially considering the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.

  2. Point taken. I was just talking about the story, which couldn’t really carry its own weight.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>