Getting the symbolism right

It’s easy to be really, really mad about the endless stream of bailouts and the treasury secretary who — oopsie! — forgot to pay his taxes. Actually, getting really, really mad probably is more than easy; it’s probably unavoidable. Who did these yahoos think they were and how come they keep saying they didn’t see it coming? Weren’t they reading Paul Krugman? Did they abandon common sense when they bought their first Lear jets?

At least on this White House redecoration thing the Obamas got the message right. The president has a few loose  millions lying around because he wrote a few best-sellers. He can pay for his own damned redecorating and he is going to do that. A small thing, for sure, but something to show that somebody doesn’t want to stick the American public with every bill incurred by the elites. Until Tim Geithner is pushed off the employment cliff, this will have to do.

TIF for street repairs? Maybe not such a great idea

While Gov. Doyle commits to spend billions to widen freeways that don’t need widening, city streets are falling apart. The situation is dire and aldermen are getting desperate to come up with some way of making things better or at least slow the descent into much, much worse.

Ald. Jim Bohl came up with an idea that will increase funding for street repairs by, in a roundabout way, increasing property tax rates for non-city units of government like the county, school district, Milwaukee Area Technical College and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District.

Bohl wants to use TIF district funds to pay for street repairs. TIFs are an economic development tool that allows municipalities to borrow to make improvements in an area, then use the new property tax revenue generated through the improvements and subsequent private development to pay off the loan. The borrowing municipality — in this case, Milwaukee — gets to use all of the new property tax money to pay down the loan instead of distributing the revenue to other taxing units as is customary.

Bohl’s idea — received warmly by several other aldermen — is to increase project costs within some or all of the city’s 48 TIF districts and use the extra money to fund street repairs outside of the districts, but within a half-mile of their borders, something state law allows. The city gets to keep the money generated by the TIF a little longer to pay off whatever the street work costs.

The other taxing units still need to collect the full amount of their levies and other property taxpayers simply will have to come up with more money to make up for the amount the city is withholding — they will, in short, be taxed at a higher rate because of the city’s keeping the TIF funds to pay for street repairs.

Yes, the streets really, really need fixing and Bohl is at least making an effort to get the damned streets fixed. Unless I’m really missing something, though, Bohl’s plan essentially would force other units of governments to put the cost of the street projects on their tax levies. This does not seem like a development likely to foster goodwill and cameraderie amongst all those starving local units of governments who can barely cover their own expenses.

Road-builders pouring concrete and money on the ground all over the state are having a good chuckle, though. No starvation worries for them. They’re eating well at the state trough.

2010 city budget cuts of 15%-20% projected

Mayor Tom Barrett will propose budget cuts of 15% to 20%  in order to deal with debt service, levy limits and employee benefit costs, according to City Budget Director Mark Nicolini.

“All of you are aware that the city has been dealing with an ongoing imbalance between the costs of continuing service levels from year-to-year and the revenue growth available to fund those costs,” Nicolini wrote in a letter outlining preliminary budget instructions. “I am sorry to inform you that the imbalance has now reached a point where ‘managed decline’ is no longer a viable budget option.”

Barrett already is warning that the city may lose as many as 1,400 jobs over the next two years.

Nicolini said there are many financial stress factors that “include the cumulative impacts of changes in state shared revenue policy and the impact of the economy on the property tax base and other non-property tax local revenues.”

Health care and retirement cost trends, which have been favorable in recent years, “have taken a decided turn for the worse,” Nicolini wrote. “Final projections about these costs will not be available until late summer, but it is clear that the only sustainable means of addressing these cost increases is a substantial reduction to the number of city employees.”

Nicolini’s letter was provided to Milwaukee Rising by Ald. Michael Murphy, chairman of the Common Council’s Finance and Personnel Committee.

For 2010, department heads should propose budgets that will only continue — and not improve — 2009 service levels and should not expect to see even those budget requests granted, he said.

“This approach to budget requests is not a blank check to request increased funding, nor should any department expect that the proposed budget will include the amount needed to continue services at their current level,” Nicolini wrote. “The city faces significant fiscal challenges. The Proposed Executive Budget will include budget reductions of between 15%-20% relative to the baseline in order to pay for non-discretionary fringe benefit cost increases and debt service within levy limits and available non-property tax revenues.”

SEWRPC’s transportation planning goes on…

SEWRPC says it will give special attention to proposals for stimulus-funded transportaiton projects in economically distressed areas and Ken Yunker said his public-outreach blowoff was an incomplete email. More on that here.

The bad news, as blogger Jim Rowen points out, is that the Federal Highway Administration says there are no economically distressed areas in southeastern Wisconsin.

Why is this the top story?

Two — count ‘em, two (that’s less than half the fingers on one hand) — researchers at UWM say global warming may take a little longer than a zillion other scientists think.

The global-warming nay-sayers glom onto and distribute a distorted, incorrect version of their research and use itto argue that the global warming issue isn’t settled.

The JS runs this on top of the front page, with a headline and lede that does not mention the part of the story that is about the misuse of the research and how it spread.

So why is this story even the lead story in the paper anyway? On a scale of 1 to 10, its newsworthiness seems about 0.