Milwaukee child welfare: does the state really care?

The Milwaukee child welfare system has been a mess forever. It will probably continue to be one, although we will now have five minutes of hand-wringing and posturing not because somebody died, but because the media covered it.

This is a high-profile moment that forced Denise Revels Robinson to resign her post. Unfortunately, she should have resigned or been forced out years ago, but managed to her job badly in a low-profile way. It does not appear that either Gov. Doyle or the State Legislature truly cares about protecting kids in Milwaukee.

When all the hands are wrung and all the tsk-tsking is over, we will be back where we began. The tragedy is that the kids will be exactly where they were, too.

Story Hill holiday party scheduled

The Story Hill Neighborhood Association Holiday Party will be held from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. Jan. 4 at Kelly’s Bleachers on W. Bluemound Rd.

The cost is $5 for SHNA members and $10 for others.

Please drop off or call in your RSVP by Dec. 30 to Mike Gregory, Kris Tym or Sandy Rusch Walton. Check your neighborhood flyer for addresses. Please make checks payable to SHNA.

This is an adults-only party, and Kelly’s will be providing complimentary beer and soda.

Attendees are asked to bring a dessert to share.

WisDOT seeks to discourage lawyers in condemnation cases

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation is seeking to change the rules and reduce the fees lawyers can earn representing property owners appealing low-bid WisDOT offers to buy their homes or businesses to make way for highways and other transportation projects.

WisDOT is getting ready to launch two major Milwaukee projects — rebuilding the Zoo Interchange and expanding North-South I-94 – that will require major property acquisitions.

The department is proposing that attorney’s fees in litigated compensation cases be limited a maximum of 1/3 of the increased purchase price awarded that amount is at least $700 and 15% higher than WisDOT’s offer. When that 1/3 increase is less than $5,000, attorney’s fees would be limited to a maximum of $5,000.

The agency makes clear that it would like to keep lawyers out of the cases.

“Litigating land purchases consumes more time and resources within the Department compared to negotiating directly with landowners,” the department said in its 2009-11 budget request. “It could adversely affect the timeline of highway construction projects. Securing land can be a first step in a project and any delays can impact final completion and overall project cost.”

The department said in its budget request that property acquisition and litigation costs increased From $5 million in 2004 to $11 million in 2007, but did not say how much property was acquired in each of those years, and how much of the spending increase went to property acquisition and how much went to litigation costs.

“The average litigation attorney fee paid for five property acquisitions between September, 2002 and June, 2006 was $65,700 compared to only $39,700 for the compensation increase paid to the owner,” the department said.

WisDOT does not say why it picked those five particular litigated cases or why the department lowballed its offers by more than $40,000 each or why it did not settle with the property owners before attorney’s fees reached the levels they did.

“The intent of these modifications is to help government agencies acquire property efficiently and reduce taxpayer costs while encouraging property owners to bring to the table their legitimate concerns,” WisDOT said. “They will encourage presenting differences of opinion and other pertinent information during the negotiation stage in order to reach an agreement before going to litigation. For the Department, minimizing litigation efforts will help highway improvement projects stay on schedule and reduce costs.”

Property owners’ rights will not be affected, WisDOT said.

“Because attorney fees are a separate reimbursable cost, establishing limits on these fees will not affect the amount an owner receives for real estate acquired by the Department,” the agency said.

He said what??!

It was a routine discussion about a Health Department grant during the Common Council’s Finance and Personnel Committee Wednesday until Ald. Joe Dudzik asked about the birth control counseling that women got.

Does the birth control come before or after penetration? he asked.

Silence. The poor woman from the Health Department looked stunned.

Oops, said Dudzik. I mean conception. Does the birth control come before or after conception?

“Hellllllooooo,” Ald. Robert Bauman called out.

It was worth all of the boring parts just for that moment.